QuestionIsn't Roundup highly toxic? Is it possible for you to recommend more
enviromentally and people friendly ways to deal with weeds, saplings, etc.? A
little manual labor in the garden is a great recommendation - (for example:
hand pulling saplings and weeds). Organic gardening is a great for you and
your garden.....
AnswerRoundup is not highly toxic.
Many people have the misconception that all compounds whose name end in "cide," such as insecticide, herbicide, rodenticide, or fungicide, can be lumped together as dangerous, highly toxic chemicals, and unsafe at any application level. This is simply not the case for the vast majority of agricultural pesticides and is certainly not true of the herbicides used on right of ways and public lands.
Herbicide means herb--plant cide-- killer. They are formulated to interfere with the cells of a plant in the case or Roundup with the green cells. For Roundup to be toxic to a 100 lb (45.5 kg) person they would have to ingest about 196,128 mg of the pure active ingredient of Roundup to kill them. Roundup varies from 41% active ingredient down and when it is sprayed on plants diluted to 1%.
Table 1 provides the acute toxicity of the active ingredient in several herbicides for comparison to some other common chemicals. The table lists the LD50, which is a rating system for chemical toxicity.
A low LD50 indicates that a small amount of chemical is toxic and is a more dangerous substance. Likewise, the larger the LD50 the less toxic the chemical.
Most of the herbicides used on public lands have active ingredients that are less toxic than caffeine. And, the active ingredient is diluted to make the herbicide product sold on the market. All over-the-counter formulations of the products listed in Table 1 have LD50s above 1,700 mg/kg (milligrams of chemical per kilogram of body weight) and so are therefore less toxic than aspirin! Even so, we still limit their use to the minimum necessary to prevent the spread of noxious weeds.
Table 1. The Relative Toxicity of Commonly Used Herbicides Trade Name Active Ingredient
LD50* mg/kg
Arsenal imazypyr 5,000
Garlon triclopyr 630
Oust sulfometuron methyl 5,000
Roundup glyphosate 4,320
Tordon picloram 8,200
Velpar hexazinone 1,690
Weedone 2,4-D 375
For Comparison: >
Table Salt 3,750
Aspirin 1,700
Malathion (insecticide) 370
Household bleach 192
Caffeine 200
*LD50 is the dose that is lethal to 50 percent of a test animal population, expressed as milligrams (mg) of chemical per kilogram (kg) of body weight.
How can this be so? How can a chemical with such low toxicity be so effective at killing plants? Imazapyr, for example, has an LD50 above 5,000 mg/kg, making it practically non-toxic. Yet this compound is a very effective herbicide and can control many of the largest trees. The secret to understanding this apparent contradiction comes from realizing that herbicides work on biochemical pathways that are specific to plants. For example, only plants photosynthesize (produce food from carbon dioxide and water), so, if a compound inhibits one or several of the steps in the long biochemical pathway that is photosynthesis, that compound is then toxic to plants. At the same time, this compound may have no effect on animal systems because the biochemical pathway for photosynthesis does not exist in animals. As another example, some herbicides work on amino acid pathways that are specific to plants and not found in animals. All of these types of compounds can be very effective herbicides yet are safe for animals because the biochemical basis for toxicity does not exist.
Some weeds can be pulled up with good control others will sprout back if the root system is not pulled also. Tree sprouts are from an root system of a parent tree that was cut and these can not be simply pulled. The best way to deal with these is the use of a herbicide.
I know I am not going to convince you that these herbicides are safe to use so the alternative is for you to pull the weeds and continue this as the need arises. For the organic garden I would tend to agree but for the sprouts from trees I do not.